Tap Water Lookup

EPA system IL0894380 · Illinois

Elgin: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID IL0894380; community water system; Illinois; source: surface water; serves 114,797 people via 34,653 connections; status: active

In focus114,797people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 19.3 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.19.3 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled April 2024–May 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Elgin is a local-government-owned community water system in Illinois serving about 114,797 people, matched to 6 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
8 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
8 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
19.3 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
6 of 8 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
3 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
240 results, 2 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
53 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · at or above the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
8 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (8 of 8 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 8 of 8 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFHxA EPA's 2023 IRIS assessment for PFHxA cites developmental, liver and blood effects in animal studies. EPA source
  • PFBA EPA's 2022 IRIS assessment for PFBA cites thyroid, liver and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 4. Lithium reached 19.3 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between April 2024 and October 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 240 samples from 2 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 4 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Lithium reached 19.3 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
19.3 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFPeAhighest single sample
4.7 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFHxAhighest single sample
4.0 ppt
below the screening level
PFBAhighest single sample
7.6 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 26 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium8619.3 ppb15.8 ppb (4 of 4)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelApril 2024 – May 2025
PFPeA834.7 ppt3.2 ppt (4 of 4)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueApril 2024 – May 2025
PFHxA834.0 ppt2.8 ppt (4 of 4)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelApril 2024 – May 2025
PFBA817.6 ppt1.9 ppt (4 of 4)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelApril 2024 – May 2025
11Cl-PF3OUdS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – May 2025
4:2 FTS80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – May 2025
6:2 FTS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – May 2025
8:2 FTS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – May 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS80< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – May 2025
ADONA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – May 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)80< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – May 2025
NEtFOSAA80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – October 2025
NFDHA80< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – May 2025
NMeFOSAA80< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – October 2025
PFBS80< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – May 2025
PFDA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – May 2025
PFDoA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – May 2025
PFEESA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – May 2025
PFHpA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – May 2025
PFHpS80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – May 2025
PFHxS80< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – May 2025
PFMBA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – May 2025
PFMPA80< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – May 2025
PFNA80< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – May 2025
PFOA80< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – May 2025
PFOS80< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – May 2025
PFPeS80< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – May 2025
PFTA80< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – October 2025
PFTrDA80< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – October 2025
PFUnA80< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2024 – May 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (13 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Jul 24, 2024TP-+1 Finished Water Riverside Plantsurface waterPFBA7.6 ppt5.0 ppt
Jul 24, 2024TP-+1 Finished Water Riverside Plantsurface waterPFHxA3.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 24, 2024TP-+1 Finished Water Riverside Plantsurface waterPFPeA4.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 24, 2024TP-+2 Finished Water Airlite Water Treatment Plantsurface waterLithium10.4 ppb9 ppb
Nov 5, 2024TP-+1 Finished Water Riverside Plantsurface waterLithium9.8 ppb9 ppb
Nov 5, 2024TP-+2 Finished Water Airlite Water Treatment Plantsurface waterLithium18.8 ppb9 ppb
Jan 27, 2025TP-+1 Finished Water Riverside Plantsurface waterPFHxA4.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Jan 27, 2025TP-+1 Finished Water Riverside Plantsurface waterPFPeA4.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 7, 2025TP-+1 Finished Water Riverside Plantsurface waterPFHxA3.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 7, 2025TP-+1 Finished Water Riverside Plantsurface waterPFPeA4.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 7, 2025TP-+1 Finished Water Riverside Plantsurface waterLithium13.1 ppb9 ppb
Feb 7, 2025TP-+2 Finished Water Airlite Water Treatment Plantsurface waterLithium19.3 ppb9 ppb
May 15, 2025TP-+2 Finished Water Airlite Water Treatment Plantsurface waterLithium14.5 ppb9 ppb

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 8 of 8 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 8 of 8 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 8 of 8 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 53 ppb, at or above the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 13 of the 29 periods on record.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020: 14.6 ppbJan 1, 2021 – Jun 30, 2021: 11.9 ppbJul 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021: 22.5 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Jun 30, 2022: 14.2 ppbJul 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022: 21 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023: 11.8 ppbJul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023: 22.8 ppbJan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024: 17.1 ppbJul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024: 50 ppbJan 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025: 43 ppbJan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025: 2.4 ppbJul 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025: 53 ppbDec 31, 2020Dec 31, 202553 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 53 ppb, at or above the action level of 15 ppb; 13 of the 29 monitoring periods on record reached the action level (7 within the last 10 years). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead2.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead53 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025Lead43 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead50 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024Lead17.1 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead22.8 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023Lead11.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022Lead21 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Jun 30, 2022Lead14.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead22.5 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Jun 30, 2021Lead11.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead14.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 29 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead2.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead53 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025Lead43 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead50 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024Lead17.1 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead22.8 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023Lead11.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022Lead21 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Jun 30, 2022Lead14.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead22.5 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Jun 30, 2021Lead11.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead14.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead12.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead12.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead14.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead8.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead10.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead9.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Jun 30, 2000Lead11 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead14 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Jun 30, 1999Lead20 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead23 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Jun 30, 1998Lead21 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead22 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Jun 30, 1997Lead15 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Jun 30, 1993Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead18 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead13 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 8 violations since Sep 3, 2016. None is health-based. All concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices, not the water itself.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 8 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 7 for monitoring or reporting, 1 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements), none health-based.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Oct 1, 2025 – Oct 31, 2025MRCarbon, TotalMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)2 records at 2 facilitiesResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Apr 1, 2025MRLead and Copper RuleLead Consumer Notice1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Nov 1, 2024 – Nov 30, 2024MRCarbon, TotalMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)2 records at 2 facilitiesResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2024OtherConsumer Confidence RuleConsumer Confidence Report Complete Failure to Report1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2024 – Sep 30, 2024MRDalaponMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2021 – Sep 30, 2021MRCarbon, TotalMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Aug 19, 2025 (sanitary survey); 6 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 3 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Filters certified for lead reduction

13 of this utility's 29 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 53 ppb).

NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 19.3 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records