Tap Water Lookup

EPA system NJ1507005 · New Jersey

Veolia Water New Jersey Toms River: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID NJ1507005; community water system; New Jersey; source: groundwater; serves 123,184 people via 48,728 connections; status: active

In focus123,184people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 13.2 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.13.2 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled August 2023–June 2024. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Veolia Water New Jersey Toms River is a privately owned community water system in New Jersey serving about 123,184 people, matched to 3 ZIP codes.

4.9 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
2 of 2 results at the highest location; highest single sample 9.8 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
2.4 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
2 of 2 results at the highest location; highest single sample 4.9 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · below the MCL
13.2 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
3 of 14 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
3 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
420 results, 7 entry points
1 at or above an MCL on the average basis
0.8 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
4 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (14 of 14 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 14 of 14 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFOA EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOA at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOA exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFOS EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOS at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOS exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFBS EPA's 2021 PFBS toxicity assessment cites thyroid, kidney and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 4. PFOA averaged 4.9 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. EPA's limit applies to a running yearly average and is enforced from 2029. That PFOA result is higher than 93% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it. Lithium reached 13.2 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between August 2023 and June 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 420 samples from 7 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 4 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOA was 4.9 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 9.8 ppt). Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOS was 2.4 ppt, below the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 4.9 ppt). Lithium reached 13.2 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
13.2 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFOAcomplete-set average
4.9 ppt
at or above the MCL
PFOScomplete-set average
2.4 ppt
below the MCL
PFBShighest single sample
8.0 ppt
below the health-based water concentration
Show the 26 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium14313.2 ppb12.9 ppb (2 of 2)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
PFOA1419.8 ppt4.9 ppt (2 of 2)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averageat or above the MCLAugust 2023 – June 2024
PFOS1424.9 ppt2.4 ppt (2 of 2)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the MCLAugust 2023 – June 2024
PFBS1438.0 ppt7.3 ppt (2 of 2)2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplebelow the health-based water concentrationAugust 2023 – June 2024
11Cl-PF3OUdS140< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
4:2 FTS140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
6:2 FTS140< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
8:2 FTS140< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
9Cl-PF3ONS140< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
ADONA140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
HFPO-DA (GenX)140< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
NEtFOSAA140< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
NFDHA140< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
NMeFOSAA140< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
PFBA140< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
PFDA140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
PFDoA140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
PFEESA140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
PFHpA140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
PFHpS140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
PFHxA140< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
PFHxS140< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
PFMBA140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
PFMPA140< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
PFNA140< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
PFPeA140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
PFPeS140< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
PFTA140< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
PFTrDA140< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
PFUnA140< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – June 2024
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (9 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Aug 7, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Brookside Plantground waterLithium13.2 ppb9 ppb
Aug 7, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Berkeley Plantground waterPFOS4.9 ppt4.0 ppt
Oct 19, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Jakes Branch (Str)ground waterPFBS8.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 19, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Whitesville - Route 70 WTPground waterPFBS7.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 19, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Whitesville - Route 70 WTPground waterPFOA9.8 ppt4.0 ppt
Oct 19, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Whitesville - Route 70 WTPground waterPFOS4.4 ppt4.0 ppt
Feb 15, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Brookside Plantground waterLithium12.6 ppb9 ppb
Mar 21, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Jakes Branch (Str)ground waterPFBS6.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 13, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Windsor Plantground waterLithium10.2 ppb9 ppb

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 14 of 14 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 14 of 14 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 14 of 14 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0.8 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 23 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011: 1 ppbJan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014: 1 ppbJan 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017: 3 ppbJul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017: 0 ppbJan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018: 0 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019: 0 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020: 0 ppbJan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021: 0 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022: 0 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023: 0.7 ppbJan 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024: 1.0 ppbJan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025: 0.8 ppbDec 31, 2011Dec 31, 20250.8 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0.8 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (23 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead0.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead1.0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead0.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 23 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead0.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead1.0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead0.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006Lead2.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Jun 30, 1996Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 4 violations since Sep 3, 2016. None is health-based. All concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices, not the water itself.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 4 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 4 for monitoring or reporting, none health-based.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Jul 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025MRLead and Copper RuleWater Quality Parameter M/R1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025MRLead and Copper RuleWater Quality Parameter M/R1 recordArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023MRLead and Copper RuleWater Quality Parameter M/R1 recordArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021MRLead and Copper RuleWater Quality Parameter M/R1 recordArchived · 2 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Mar 21, 2023 (sanitary survey); 2 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 3 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 13.2 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records