Tap Water Lookup

EPA system WA5363450 · Washington

Olympia City of: 5 PFAS found; PFOS averaged 2.9 ppt, below the 4.0 ppt limit

System ID WA5363450; community water system; Washington; source: groundwater; serves 126,966 people via 38,115 connections; status: active

In focus126,966people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referencePFOS
PFOS: 2.9 ppt; MCL 4.0 ppt. highest complete sampling-location average.2.9 pptMCL: 4.0 ppt

highest complete sampling-location average; sampled October 2023–April 2024. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Olympia City of is a local-government-owned community water system in Washington serving about 126,966 people, matched to 4 ZIP codes.

2.2 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
2 of 2 results at the highest location; highest single sample 4.3 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · below the MCL
2.9 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
2 of 2 results at the highest location; highest single sample 5.8 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · below the MCL
< 9 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
11 samples, none above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · not detected above the reporting level
5 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
355 results, 6 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
3.4 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
1 violation in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (10 of 10 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 10 of 12 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • PFOS EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOS at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOS exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFOA EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOA at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOA exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFBS EPA's 2021 PFBS toxicity assessment cites thyroid, kidney and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source
  • PFHxA EPA's 2023 IRIS assessment for PFHxA cites developmental, liver and blood effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 5. PFOA averaged 2.2 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt, and PFOS averaged 2.9 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. That PFOS result is higher than 90% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it.

Between October 2023 and April 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 355 samples from 6 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 5 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOA was 2.2 ppt, below the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 4.3 ppt). Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOS was 2.9 ppt, below the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 5.8 ppt).

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
PFPeAhighest single sample
3.3 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFOScomplete-set average
2.9 ppt
below the MCL
PFOAcomplete-set average
2.2 ppt
below the MCL
PFBShighest single sample
4.8 ppt
below the health-based water concentration
PFHxAhighest single sample
4.0 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 25 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Lithiumnot detected · reporting level 9 ppb
< 9 ppb
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
PFPeA1213.3 ppt1.7 ppt (2 of 2)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueOctober 2023 – April 2024
PFOS1215.8 ppt2.9 ppt (2 of 2)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the MCLOctober 2023 – April 2024
PFOA1214.3 ppt2.2 ppt (2 of 2)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the MCLOctober 2023 – April 2024
PFBS1224.8 ppt4.6 ppt (2 of 2)2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplebelow the health-based water concentrationOctober 2023 – April 2024
PFHxA1214.0 ppt2.0 ppt (2 of 2)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
11Cl-PF3OUdS120< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
4:2 FTS120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
6:2 FTS120< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
8:2 FTS120< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
9Cl-PF3ONS120< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
ADONA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
HFPO-DA (GenX)120< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
Lithium110< 9 ppb10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
NEtFOSAA110< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
NFDHA120< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
NMeFOSAA110< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
PFBA120< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
PFDA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
PFDoA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
PFEESA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
PFHpA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
PFHpS120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
PFHxS120< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
PFMBA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
PFMPA120< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
PFNA120< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
PFPeS120< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
PFTA110< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
PFTrDA110< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
PFUnA120< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2023 – April 2024
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (6 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Oct 18, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Well #11 (Shana Park)ground waterPFBS4.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 23, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Well #11 (Shana Park)ground waterPFBS4.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 23, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Well #11 (Shana Park)ground waterPFHxA4.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 23, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Well #11 (Shana Park)ground waterPFOA4.3 ppt4.0 ppt
Apr 23, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Well #11 (Shana Park)ground waterPFOS5.8 ppt4.0 ppt
Apr 23, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Well #11 (Shana Park)ground waterPFPeA3.3 ppt3.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 10 of 12 sampling events, no at 2 of 12 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 12 of 12 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 10 of 10 sampling events.

Lead and copper at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 3.4 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 14 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1997 – Jun 30, 1997: 5 ppbJul 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1998: 12 ppbJan 1, 1993 – Feb 14, 2001: 9 ppbJan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2004: 7.7 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2006: 3 ppbJan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009: 6 ppbJan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012: 5 ppbJan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015: 6.7 ppbJul 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018: 3 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Jun 30, 2019: 1 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022: 4.2 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025: 3.4 ppbJun 30, 1997Dec 31, 20253.4 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 3.4 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (14 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead3.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead4.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Jun 30, 2019Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015Lead6.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2006Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2004Lead7.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Feb 14, 2001Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1998Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Jun 30, 1997Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 15 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead3.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead4.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Jun 30, 2019Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015Lead6.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2006Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2004Lead7.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Feb 14, 2001Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1998Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Jun 30, 1997Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Copper1,800 ppb1,300 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead11 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 1 violation since Sep 3, 2016. None is health-based. All concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices, not the water itself.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 1 violation recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 1 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements), none health-based.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Jul 1, 2025OtherConsumer Confidence RuleConsumer Confidence Report Complete Failure to Report1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Nov 8, 2022 (sanitary survey); 1 visit since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 5 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records