Tap Water Lookup

EPA system CA1910036 · California

California Water Service Co. - Ela: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID CA1910036; community water system; California; source: purchased surface water; serves 152,474 people via 26,215 connections; status: active

In focus152,474people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 47.1 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.47.1 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled January 2025–October 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

California Water Service Co. - Ela is a privately owned community water system in California serving about 152,474 people, matched to 10 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
22 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
8.3 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
2 of 2 results at the highest location; highest single sample 8.6 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
47.1 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
6 of 22 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
5 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
660 results, 10 entry points
1 at or above an MCL on the average basis
0 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2023
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
0 violations in total

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFOS EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOS at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOS exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFHxA EPA's 2023 IRIS assessment for PFHxA cites developmental, liver and blood effects in animal studies. EPA source
  • PFBS EPA's 2021 PFBS toxicity assessment cites thyroid, kidney and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 6. PFOS averaged 8.3 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. EPA's limit applies to a running yearly average and is enforced from 2029. That PFOS result is higher than 96% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it. Lithium reached 47.1 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between January 2025 and October 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 660 samples from 10 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 6 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOS was 8.3 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 8.6 ppt). Lithium reached 47.1 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
47.1 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFPeAhighest single sample
12.9 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFOScomplete-set average
8.3 ppt
at or above the MCL
PFHxAhighest single sample
7.6 ppt
below the screening level
PFBShighest single sample
4.9 ppt
below the health-based water concentration
PFBAhighest single sample
8.0 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 24 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium22647.1 ppb33.5 ppb (4 of 4)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFPeA22512.9 ppt9.0 ppt (2 of 2)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFOS2228.6 ppt8.3 ppt (2 of 2)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averageat or above the MCLJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFHxA2247.6 ppt3.8 ppt (2 of 2)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFBS2234.9 ppt2.4 ppt (2 of 2)2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplebelow the health-based water concentrationJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFBA2258.0 ppt7.7 ppt (2 of 2)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
11Cl-PF3OUdS220< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
4:2 FTS220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
6:2 FTS220< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
8:2 FTS220< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS220< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
ADONA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)220< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
NEtFOSAA220< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
NFDHA220< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
NMeFOSAA220< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFDA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFDoA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFEESA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFHpA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFHpS220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFHxS220< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFMBA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFMPA220< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFNA220< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFOA220< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFPeS220< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFTA220< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFTrDA220< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFUnA220< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (25 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Jan 7, 2025ELA-W-039-02-EFF Well 39-02ground waterPFOS7.9 ppt4.0 ppt
Jan 7, 2025ELA-W-039-02-EFF Well 39-02ground waterLithium11.9 ppb9 ppb
Jan 8, 2025ELA-W-063-01-EFF Well 63-01ground waterPFPeA8.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Jan 8, 2025ELA-C-CB1 Central Basin #1 Turnoutsurface waterLithium45.7 ppb9 ppb
Jan 8, 2025ELA-W-062-02-EFF Well 62-02ground waterPFBA8.0 ppt5.0 ppt
Jan 27, 2025ELA-W-062-01-EFF Well 62-01ground waterPFBA5.6 ppt5.0 ppt
Apr 9, 2025ELA-C-CB1 Central Basin #1 Turnoutsurface waterPFBA6.0 ppt5.0 ppt
Apr 9, 2025ELA-C-CB1 Central Basin #1 Turnoutsurface waterLithium47.1 ppb9 ppb
Jul 15, 2025ELA-W-063-01-EFF Well 63-01ground waterPFBS4.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 15, 2025ELA-W-063-01-EFF Well 63-01ground waterPFHxA7.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 15, 2025ELA-W-063-01-EFF Well 63-01ground waterPFPeA9.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 15, 2025ELA-W-062-01-EFF Well 62-01ground waterPFBA7.0 ppt5.0 ppt
Jul 15, 2025ELA-W-062-01-EFF Well 62-01ground waterPFBS3.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 15, 2025ELA-W-062-01-EFF Well 62-01ground waterPFHxA7.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 15, 2025ELA-W-062-01-EFF Well 62-01ground waterPFPeA12.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 15, 2025ELA-W-062-02-EFF Well 62-02ground waterPFBA7.3 ppt5.0 ppt
Jul 15, 2025ELA-W-062-02-EFF Well 62-02ground waterPFBS4.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 15, 2025ELA-W-062-02-EFF Well 62-02ground waterPFHxA6.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 15, 2025ELA-W-062-02-EFF Well 62-02ground waterPFPeA9.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 16, 2025ELA-W-039-02-EFF Well 39-02ground waterLithium12.6 ppb9 ppb
Jul 16, 2025ELA-W-043-01-EFF Well 43-1ground waterPFHxA3.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 16, 2025ELA-W-043-01-EFF Well 43-1ground waterPFPeA3.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 16, 2025ELA-C-CB1 Central Basin #1 Turnoutsurface waterLithium12.2 ppb9 ppb
Jul 22, 2025ELA-W-039-02-EFF Well 39-02ground waterPFOS8.6 ppt4.0 ppt
Oct 15, 2025ELA-C-CB1 Central Basin #1 Turnoutsurface waterLithium28.9 ppb9 ppb

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: no at 24 of 24 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: not known at 24 of 24 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2023, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 22 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 2000: 0 ppbJan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001: 0 ppbJan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2002: 5 ppbJan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002: 5 ppbJan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005: 0 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005: 5 ppbJan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008: 0 ppbJan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011: 0 ppbJan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014: 0 ppbJan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017: 0 ppbJan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020: 1.4 ppbJan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2023: 0 ppbDec 31, 2000Dec 31, 20230 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2023, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (22 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2023Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020Lead1.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2002Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 2000Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 22 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2023Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020Lead1.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2002Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 2000Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1999Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Dec 31, 1995Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1994Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Dec 31, 1993Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Jun 30, 1993Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead2.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists no drinking-water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

EPA's SDWIS database lists no drinking water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

None on file.

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Dec 20, 2024 (sanitary survey); 2 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 5 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 47.1 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records