Tap Water Lookup

EPA system CA1910043 · California

Glendale-City, Water Dept.: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID CA1910043; community water system; California; source: purchased surface water; serves 188,784 people via 36,074 connections; status: active

In focus188,784people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 60.4 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.60.4 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled October 2024–July 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Glendale-City, Water Dept. is a local-government-owned community water system in California serving about 188,784 people, matched to 13 ZIP codes.

14.2 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
2 of 2 results at the highest location; highest single sample 14.8 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
15.3 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
2 of 2 results at the highest location; highest single sample 15.8 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
60.4 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
4 of 12 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
8 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
360 results, 5 entry points
2 at or above an MCL on the average basis
0 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2023
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
0 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (12 of 12 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 12 of 12 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFOS EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOS at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOS exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFOA EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOA at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOA exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFHxS EPA's 2024 rule cites health effects assessments associating PFHxS with thyroid, liver and immune effects. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 9. PFOA averaged 14.2 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt, and PFOS averaged 15.3 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. EPA's limit applies to a running yearly average and is enforced from 2029. That PFOS result is higher than 98% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it. Lithium reached 60.4 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between October 2024 and July 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 360 samples from 5 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 9 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOA was 14.2 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 14.8 ppt). Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOS was 15.3 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 15.8 ppt). Lithium reached 60.4 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
60.4 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFPeAhighest single sample
12.2 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFOScomplete-set average
15.3 ppt
at or above the MCL
PFOAcomplete-set average
14.2 ppt
at or above the MCL
PFHpAhighest single sample
5.3 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFHxScomplete-set average
5.3 ppt
below the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)
PFBShighest single sample
16.9 ppt
below the health-based water concentration
PFHxAhighest single sample
11.6 ppt
below the screening level
PFBAhighest single sample
11.0 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 21 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium12460.4 ppb42.4 ppb (4 of 4)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFPeA12612.2 ppt11.5 ppt (2 of 2)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFOS12615.8 ppt15.3 ppt (2 of 2)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averageat or above the MCLOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFOA12614.8 ppt14.2 ppt (2 of 2)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averageat or above the MCLOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFHpA1265.3 ppt5.1 ppt (2 of 2)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFHxS1265.5 ppt5.3 ppt (2 of 2)10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)October 2024 – July 2025
PFBS12616.9 ppt16.8 ppt (2 of 2)2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplebelow the health-based water concentrationOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFHxA12611.6 ppt11.3 ppt (2 of 2)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFBA12611.0 ppt10.8 ppt (2 of 2)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
11Cl-PF3OUdS120< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
4:2 FTS120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
6:2 FTS120< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
8:2 FTS120< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS120< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
ADONA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)120< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
NEtFOSAA120< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
NFDHA120< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
NMeFOSAA120< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFDA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFDoA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFEESA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFHpS120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFMBA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFMPA120< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFNA120< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFPeS120< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFTA120< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFTrDA120< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFUnA120< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (52 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Oct 3, 2024Well 3 Glorietta Well 3ground waterPFBA7.1 ppt5.0 ppt
Oct 3, 2024Well 3 Glorietta Well 3ground waterPFBS12.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 3, 2024Well 3 Glorietta Well 3ground waterPFHpA4.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 3, 2024Well 3 Glorietta Well 3ground waterPFHxA11.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 3, 2024Well 3 Glorietta Well 3ground waterPFHxS5.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 3, 2024Well 3 Glorietta Well 3ground waterPFOA8.7 ppt4.0 ppt
Oct 3, 2024Well 3 Glorietta Well 3ground waterPFOS10.4 ppt4.0 ppt
Oct 3, 2024Well 3 Glorietta Well 3ground waterPFPeA11.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 8, 2024MWD G1 Entry Point MWD Intertie G1surface waterLithium45.1 ppb9 ppb
Oct 9, 2024Well 4 Glorietta Well 4ground waterPFBA10.5 ppt5.0 ppt
Oct 9, 2024Well 4 Glorietta Well 4ground waterPFBS16.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 9, 2024Well 4 Glorietta Well 4ground waterPFHpA4.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 9, 2024Well 4 Glorietta Well 4ground waterPFHxA9.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 9, 2024Well 4 Glorietta Well 4ground waterPFHxS4.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 9, 2024Well 4 Glorietta Well 4ground waterPFOA13.6 ppt4.0 ppt
Oct 9, 2024Well 4 Glorietta Well 4ground waterPFOS14.7 ppt4.0 ppt
Oct 9, 2024Well 4 Glorietta Well 4ground waterPFPeA10.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 9, 2024Well 6 Glorietta Well 6ground waterPFBA6.8 ppt5.0 ppt
Oct 9, 2024Well 6 Glorietta Well 6ground waterPFBS10.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 9, 2024Well 6 Glorietta Well 6ground waterPFHpA5.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 9, 2024Well 6 Glorietta Well 6ground waterPFHxA11.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 9, 2024Well 6 Glorietta Well 6ground waterPFHxS4.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 9, 2024Well 6 Glorietta Well 6ground waterPFOA11.0 ppt4.0 ppt
Oct 9, 2024Well 6 Glorietta Well 6ground waterPFOS9.0 ppt4.0 ppt
Oct 9, 2024Well 6 Glorietta Well 6ground waterPFPeA12.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Jan 9, 2025MWD G1 Entry Point MWD Intertie G1surface waterLithium60.4 ppb9 ppb
Apr 17, 2025Well 3 Glorietta Well 3ground waterPFBA6.9 ppt5.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025Well 3 Glorietta Well 3ground waterPFBS11.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025Well 3 Glorietta Well 3ground waterPFHpA4.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025Well 3 Glorietta Well 3ground waterPFHxA11.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025Well 3 Glorietta Well 3ground waterPFHxS5.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025Well 3 Glorietta Well 3ground waterPFOA10.0 ppt4.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025Well 3 Glorietta Well 3ground waterPFOS9.5 ppt4.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025Well 3 Glorietta Well 3ground waterPFPeA10.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025Well 4 Glorietta Well 4ground waterPFBA11.0 ppt5.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025Well 4 Glorietta Well 4ground waterPFBS16.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025Well 4 Glorietta Well 4ground waterPFHpA5.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025Well 4 Glorietta Well 4ground waterPFHxA11.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025Well 4 Glorietta Well 4ground waterPFHxS5.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025Well 4 Glorietta Well 4ground waterPFOA14.8 ppt4.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025Well 4 Glorietta Well 4ground waterPFOS15.8 ppt4.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025Well 4 Glorietta Well 4ground waterPFPeA12.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025Well 6 Glorietta Well 6ground waterPFBA6.0 ppt5.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025Well 6 Glorietta Well 6ground waterPFBS8.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025Well 6 Glorietta Well 6ground waterPFHpA4.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025Well 6 Glorietta Well 6ground waterPFHxA10.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025Well 6 Glorietta Well 6ground waterPFHxS4.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025Well 6 Glorietta Well 6ground waterPFOA9.1 ppt4.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025Well 6 Glorietta Well 6ground waterPFOS7.6 ppt4.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025Well 6 Glorietta Well 6ground waterPFPeA10.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 17, 2025MWD G1 Entry Point MWD Intertie G1surface waterLithium35.6 ppb9 ppb
Jul 9, 2025MWD G1 Entry Point MWD Intertie G1surface waterLithium28.5 ppb9 ppb

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 12 of 12 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 12 of 12 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 12 of 12 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2023, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 21 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001: 5 ppbJan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2002: 3 ppbJan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002: 3 ppbJan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005: 5 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005: 5 ppbJan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006: 5 ppbJan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008: 0 ppbJan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011: 0 ppbJan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014: 0 ppbJan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017: 0 ppbJan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020: 4.1 ppbJan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2023: 0 ppbDec 31, 2001Dec 31, 20230 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2023, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (21 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2023Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020Lead4.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2002Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 21 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2023Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020Lead4.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2002Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists no drinking-water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

EPA's SDWIS database lists no drinking water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

None on file.

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Apr 9, 2025 (sanitary survey); 1 visit since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 8 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 60.4 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records