Tap Water Lookup

EPA system CA1910126 · California

Pomona - City, Water Dept.: PFOS at or above EPA's 4.0 ppt limit

System ID CA1910126; community water system; California; source: surface water; serves 151,713 people via 30,172 connections; status: active

In focus151,713people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referencePFOS
PFOS: 14.5 ppt; MCL 4.0 ppt. highest complete sampling-location average.14.5 pptMCL: 4.0 ppt

highest complete sampling-location average; sampled August 2023–May 2024. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Pomona - City, Water Dept. is a local-government-owned community water system in California serving about 151,713 people, matched to 5 ZIP codes.

6.5 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
2 of 2 results at the highest location; highest single sample 7.1 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
14.5 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
2 of 2 results at the highest location; highest single sample 18.0 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
9.3 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
1 of 30 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · below the health reference level
6 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
900 results, 10 entry points
2 at or above an MCL on the average basis
2.1 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
0 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (16 of 16 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 16 of 30 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • PFOS EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOS at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOS exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFOA EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOA at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOA exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFHxS EPA's 2024 rule cites health effects assessments associating PFHxS with thyroid, liver and immune effects. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 7. PFOA averaged 6.5 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt, and PFOS averaged 14.5 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. EPA's limit applies to a running yearly average and is enforced from 2029. That PFOS result is higher than 98% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it. Lithium reached 9.3 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between August 2023 and May 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 900 samples from 10 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 7 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOA was 6.5 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 7.1 ppt). Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOS was 14.5 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 18.0 ppt). Lithium reached 9.3 ppb in a single sample, below the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
PFOScomplete-set average
14.5 ppt
at or above the MCL
PFOAcomplete-set average
6.5 ppt
at or above the MCL
PFPeAhighest single sample
4.4 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
Lithiumhighest single sample
9.3 ppb
below the health reference level
PFHxScomplete-set average
7.8 ppt
below the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)
PFBShighest single sample
3.2 ppt
below the health-based water concentration
PFHxAhighest single sample
4.1 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 23 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
PFOS30218.0 ppt14.5 ppt (2 of 2)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averageat or above the MCLAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFOA3027.1 ppt6.5 ppt (2 of 2)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averageat or above the MCLAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFPeA3024.4 ppt3.8 ppt (2 of 2)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueAugust 2023 – May 2024
Lithium3019.3 ppb2.3 ppb (4 of 4)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplebelow the health reference levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFHxS3027.9 ppt7.8 ppt (2 of 2)10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)August 2023 – May 2024
PFBS3023.2 ppt3.1 ppt (2 of 2)2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplebelow the health-based water concentrationAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFHxA3024.1 ppt3.7 ppt (2 of 2)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
11Cl-PF3OUdS300< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
4:2 FTS300< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
6:2 FTS300< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
8:2 FTS300< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
9Cl-PF3ONS300< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
ADONA300< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
HFPO-DA (GenX)300< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
NEtFOSAA300< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
NFDHA300< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
NMeFOSAA300< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFBA300< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFDA300< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFDoA300< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFEESA300< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFHpA300< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFHpS300< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFMBA300< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFMPA300< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFNA300< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFPeS300< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFTA300< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFTrDA300< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFUnA300< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (13 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Aug 23, 2023W27-T Well 27ground waterPFBS3.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 23, 2023W27-T Well 27ground waterPFHxA3.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 23, 2023W27-T Well 27ground waterPFHxS7.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 23, 2023W27-T Well 27ground waterPFOA5.8 ppt4.0 ppt
Aug 23, 2023W27-T Well 27ground waterPFOS11.0 ppt4.0 ppt
Aug 23, 2023W27-T Well 27ground waterPFPeA3.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 23, 2023R10 Reservoir 10- Distribution Watermixed ground and surface waterLithium9.3 ppb9 ppb
Apr 25, 2024W27-T Well 27ground waterPFBS3.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 25, 2024W27-T Well 27ground waterPFHxA4.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 25, 2024W27-T Well 27ground waterPFHxS7.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 25, 2024W27-T Well 27ground waterPFOA7.1 ppt4.0 ppt
Apr 25, 2024W27-T Well 27ground waterPFOS18.0 ppt4.0 ppt
Apr 25, 2024W27-T Well 27ground waterPFPeA4.4 ppt3.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 16 of 30 sampling events, no at 14 of 30 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 30 of 30 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 16 of 16 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 2.1 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 19 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999: 9 ppbJan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001: 5 ppbJan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2003: 5 ppbJan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005: 9 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005: 9 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007: 9 ppbJan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010: 4 ppbJan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013: 3 ppbJan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016: 4.5 ppbJan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019: 4.1 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022: 0 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025: 2.1 ppbDec 31, 1999Dec 31, 20252.1 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 2.1 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (19 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead2.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead4.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead4.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2003Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 19 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead2.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead4.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead4.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2003Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1994Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1994 – Dec 31, 1994Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead2.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists no drinking-water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

EPA's SDWIS database lists no drinking water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

None on file.

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Dec 3, 2019 (sanitary survey); 0 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 6 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records