Tap Water Lookup

EPA system CA3010038 · California

City of Santa Ana: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID CA3010038; community water system; California; source: purchased surface water; serves 310,539 people via 45,743 connections; status: active

In focus310,539people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 42.4 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.42.4 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled March 2023–January 2026. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

City of Santa Ana is a local-government-owned community water system in California serving about 310,539 people, matched to 11 ZIP codes.

8.1 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
2 of 2 results at the highest location; highest single sample 8.9 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
13.5 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
2 of 2 results at the highest location; highest single sample 14.2 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
42.4 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
9 of 27 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
5 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
835 results, 12 entry points
2 at or above an MCL on the average basis
0 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2024
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
1 violation in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: Ion exchange (2 of 28 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 28 of 28 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFOS EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOS at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOS exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFOA EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOA at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOA exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFHxS EPA's 2024 rule cites health effects assessments associating PFHxS with thyroid, liver and immune effects. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 6. PFOA averaged 8.1 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt, and PFOS averaged 13.5 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. EPA's limit applies to a running yearly average and is enforced from 2029. That PFOS result is higher than 98% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it. Lithium reached 42.4 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between March 2023 and April 2026, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 835 samples from 12 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 6 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOA was 8.1 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 8.9 ppt). Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOS was 13.5 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 14.2 ppt). Lithium reached 42.4 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
42.4 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFOScomplete-set average
13.5 ppt
at or above the MCL
PFOAcomplete-set average
8.1 ppt
at or above the MCL
PFPeAhighest single sample
5.9 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFHxScomplete-set average
7.9 ppt
below the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)
PFHxAhighest single sample
4.0 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 24 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium27942.4 ppb36.5 ppb (2 of 2)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelMarch 2023 – January 2026
PFOS28714.2 ppt13.5 ppt (2 of 2)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averageat or above the MCLMarch 2023 – April 2026
PFOA2888.9 ppt8.1 ppt (2 of 2)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averageat or above the MCLMarch 2023 – April 2026
PFPeA2855.9 ppt4.8 ppt (2 of 2)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueMarch 2023 – April 2026
PFHxS2898.4 ppt7.9 ppt (2 of 2)10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)March 2023 – April 2026
PFHxA2844.0 ppt3.7 ppt (2 of 2)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
11Cl-PF3OUdS280< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
4:2 FTS280< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
6:2 FTS280< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
8:2 FTS280< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
9Cl-PF3ONS280< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
ADONA280< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
HFPO-DA (GenX)280< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
NEtFOSAA270< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
NFDHA280< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
NMeFOSAA270< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
PFBA280< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
PFBS280< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
PFDA280< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
PFDoA280< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
PFEESA280< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
PFHpA280< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
PFHpS280< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
PFMBA280< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
PFMPA280< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
PFNA280< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
PFPeS280< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
PFTA270< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
PFTrDA270< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
PFUnA280< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – April 2026
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (42 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Jun 21, 2023IS-DIEMER-PLANTEFF-SA MWD Intertie 1surface waterLithium20.9 ppb9 ppb
Sep 13, 2023IS-DIEMER-PLANTEFF-SA MWD Intertie 1surface waterLithium36.4 ppb9 ppb
Dec 6, 2023IS-DIEMER-PLANTEFF-SA MWD Intertie 1surface waterLithium31.7 ppb9 ppb
Aug 15, 2024EP #49 - RES-SACROOKE-01 Well 27ground waterLithium34.6 ppb9 ppb
Aug 15, 2024EP #48 - RES-SAEAST-01 Well 26ground waterPFHxS3.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 15, 2024EP #48 - RES-SAEAST-01 Well 26ground waterPFOA4.1 ppt4.0 ppt
Aug 15, 2024EP #48 - RES-SAEAST-01 Well 26ground waterLithium9.5 ppb9 ppb
Aug 15, 2024EP #41 - RES-SAWALNUT-01 Walnut Reservoirground waterPFHxA3.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 15, 2024EP #41 - RES-SAWALNUT-01 Walnut Reservoirground waterPFHxS6.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 15, 2024EP #41 - RES-SAWALNUT-01 Walnut Reservoirground waterPFOA7.3 ppt4.0 ppt
Aug 15, 2024EP #41 - RES-SAWALNUT-01 Walnut Reservoirground waterPFOS10.9 ppt4.0 ppt
Aug 15, 2024EP #41 - RES-SAWALNUT-01 Walnut Reservoirground waterPFPeA3.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 15, 2024EP #40 - RES-SAGARTHE-01 Garthe (Bristol) Reservoirground waterPFHxA3.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 15, 2024EP #40 - RES-SAGARTHE-01 Garthe (Bristol) Reservoirground waterPFHxS7.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 15, 2024EP #40 - RES-SAGARTHE-01 Garthe (Bristol) Reservoirground waterPFOA7.5 ppt4.0 ppt
Aug 15, 2024EP #40 - RES-SAGARTHE-01 Garthe (Bristol) Reservoirground waterPFOS12.9 ppt4.0 ppt
Aug 15, 2024PFAS-SA40-IX-FNSH Well 40 Pfas Treatment Facilityground waterPFPeA3.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 24, 2024EP-SA39-01 Well 39ground waterPFHxS5.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 24, 2024EP-SA39-01 Well 39ground waterPFOA4.7 ppt4.0 ppt
Sep 24, 2024EP-SA39-01 Well 39ground waterPFOS8.0 ppt4.0 ppt
Feb 11, 2025EP #58 - EP-SA35-01 Well 35ground waterPFHxS3.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 11, 2025EP #49 - RES-SACROOKE-01 Well 27ground waterLithium38.5 ppb9 ppb
Feb 11, 2025EP #48 - RES-SAEAST-01 Well 26ground waterPFHxS4.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 11, 2025EP #48 - RES-SAEAST-01 Well 26ground waterPFOA5.7 ppt4.0 ppt
Feb 11, 2025EP #48 - RES-SAEAST-01 Well 26ground waterPFOS4.6 ppt4.0 ppt
Feb 11, 2025EP #48 - RES-SAEAST-01 Well 26ground waterLithium9.0 ppb9 ppb
Feb 11, 2025EP #41 - RES-SAWALNUT-01 Walnut Reservoirground waterPFHxA4.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 11, 2025EP #41 - RES-SAWALNUT-01 Walnut Reservoirground waterPFHxS7.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 11, 2025EP #41 - RES-SAWALNUT-01 Walnut Reservoirground waterPFOA8.9 ppt4.0 ppt
Feb 11, 2025EP #41 - RES-SAWALNUT-01 Walnut Reservoirground waterPFOS12.6 ppt4.0 ppt
Feb 11, 2025EP #41 - RES-SAWALNUT-01 Walnut Reservoirground waterPFPeA3.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 11, 2025EP #40 - RES-SAGARTHE-01 Garthe (Bristol) Reservoirground waterPFHxA3.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 11, 2025EP #40 - RES-SAGARTHE-01 Garthe (Bristol) Reservoirground waterPFHxS8.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 11, 2025EP #40 - RES-SAGARTHE-01 Garthe (Bristol) Reservoirground waterPFOA7.2 ppt4.0 ppt
Feb 11, 2025EP #40 - RES-SAGARTHE-01 Garthe (Bristol) Reservoirground waterPFOS14.2 ppt4.0 ppt
Feb 11, 2025EP #40 - RES-SAGARTHE-01 Garthe (Bristol) Reservoirground waterPFPeA3.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 11, 2025EP-SA39-01 Well 39ground waterPFHxS5.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 11, 2025EP-SA39-01 Well 39ground waterPFOA5.8 ppt4.0 ppt
Feb 11, 2025EP-SA39-01 Well 39ground waterPFOS9.6 ppt4.0 ppt
Feb 11, 2025PFAS-SA40-IX-FNSH Well 40 Pfas Treatment Facilityground waterPFPeA5.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 20, 2025IS-F6-SA MWD Intertie 3surface waterLithium27.9 ppb9 ppb
Jan 27, 2026IS-F6-SA MWD Intertie 3surface waterLithium42.4 ppb9 ppb

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 28 of 28 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: not known at 28 of 28 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 26 of 28 sampling events, ion exchange at 2 of 28 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 15 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1993 – Dec 31, 1993: 5 ppbJan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001: 5 ppbJan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002: 5 ppbJan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003: 5 ppbJan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005: 0 ppbJan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006: 0 ppbJan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009: 0 ppbJan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012: 0 ppbJan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015: 0 ppbJan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018: 0 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021: 0 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024: 0 ppbDec 31, 1993Dec 31, 20240 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (15 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Dec 31, 1993Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 15 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Dec 31, 1993Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Jun 30, 1993Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead2.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 1 violation since Sep 3, 2016. None is health-based. All concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices, not the water itself.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 1 violation recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 1 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements), none health-based.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Oct 1, 2021OtherRevised Total Coliform RuleSample Siting Plan Errors (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Mar 27, 2024 (sanitary survey); 2 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 5 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 42.4 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records