EPA system CA3010062 · California

City of Garden Grove: PFOS at or above EPA's 4.0 ppt limit

System ID CA3010062; community water system; California; source: purchased surface water; serves 174,226 people via 34,644 connections; status: active

In focus174,226people served, EPA registry

Public records. Clearer context.

City of Garden Grove is a local-government-owned community water system in California serving about 174,226 people, matched to 9 ZIP codes.

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: Ion exchange (8 of 26 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 26 of 26 sampling events

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 7. PFOA averaged 8.1 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt, and PFOS averaged 18.7 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. EPA's limit applies to a running yearly average and is enforced from 2029. That PFOS result is higher than 99% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it. Lithium reached 35.0 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between March 2023 and April 2026, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 775 samples from 11 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 7 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOA was 8.1 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 8.1 ppt). Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOS was 18.7 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 19.0 ppt). Lithium reached 35.0 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 26 of 26 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: not known at 26 of 26 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 18 of 26 sampling events, ion exchange at 8 of 26 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 19 periods on record reached it.

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (19 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists no drinking-water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

EPA's SDWIS database lists no drinking water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

None on file.

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Sep 15, 2022 (sanitary survey); 1 visit since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

• EPA ECHO detailed facility report
• EPA UCMR 5 Data Finder
• EPA service-area boundary: modeled, 18.1 sq mi