EPA system CA3610024 · California
Hesperia WD: PFOS at or above EPA's 4.0 ppt limit
highest complete sampling-location average; sampled July 2023–January 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.
Hesperia WD is a local-government-owned community water system in California serving about 100,744 people, matched to 2 ZIP codes.
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
What EPA says about what was found
- PFOS EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOS at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOS exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
- PFOA EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOA at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOA exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
- Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
- PFHxS EPA's 2024 rule cites health effects assessments associating PFHxS with thyroid, liver and immune effects. EPA source
Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.
PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found
EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 8. PFOA averaged 5.1 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt, and PFOS averaged 5.6 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. EPA's limit applies to a running yearly average and is enforced from 2029. That PFOS result is higher than 93% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it. Lithium reached 10.2 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.
Between July 2023 and January 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 900 samples from 15 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 8 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOA was 5.1 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 10.2 ppt). Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOS was 5.6 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 11.1 ppt). Lithium reached 10.2 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.
Show the 22 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
| Contaminant | Samples | Detections | Highest single sample | Complete-set average (results used) | EPA reference | Status | Sampled |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6:2 FTS | 30 | 1 | 50.3 ppt | 25.2 ppt (2 of 2) | none set | detected; no EPA reference value | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| PFPeA | 30 | 1 | 4.2 ppt | 2.1 ppt (2 of 2) | none set | detected; no EPA reference value | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| PFOS | 30 | 3 | 11.1 ppt | 5.6 ppt (2 of 2) | 4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set average | at or above the MCL | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| PFOA | 30 | 2 | 10.2 ppt | 5.1 ppt (2 of 2) | 4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set average | at or above the MCL | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| PFHpA | 30 | 1 | 3.1 ppt | 1.6 ppt (2 of 2) | none set | detected; no EPA reference value | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| Lithium | 30 | 1 | 10.2 ppb | 5.1 ppb (2 of 2) | 10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sample | at or above the health reference level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| PFHxS | 30 | 3 | 10.5 ppt | 5.3 ppt (2 of 2) | 10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set average | below the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed) | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| PFHxA | 30 | 2 | 5.4 ppt | 2.7 ppt (2 of 2) | 3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest sample | below the screening level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| 11Cl-PF3OUdS | 30 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| 4:2 FTS | 30 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| 8:2 FTS | 30 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| 9Cl-PF3ONS | 30 | 0 | < 2.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| ADONA | 30 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| HFPO-DA (GenX) | 30 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | 10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set average | not detected above the reporting level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| NEtFOSAA | 30 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| NFDHA | 30 | 0 | < 20.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| NMeFOSAA | 30 | 0 | < 6.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| PFBA | 30 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | 6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest sample | not detected above the reporting level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| PFBS | 30 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | 2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest sample | not detected above the reporting level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| PFDA | 30 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| PFDoA | 30 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| PFEESA | 30 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| PFHpS | 30 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| PFMBA | 30 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| PFMPA | 30 | 0 | < 4.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| PFNA | 30 | 0 | < 4.0 ppt | — | 10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set average | not detected above the reporting level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| PFPeS | 30 | 0 | < 4.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| PFTA | 30 | 0 | < 8.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| PFTrDA | 30 | 0 | < 7.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
| PFUnA | 30 | 0 | < 2.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | July 2023 – January 2025 |
Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.
Every detection by sampling location (14 results)
| Date | Sampling location | Source water | Contaminant | Result | Reporting level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2023 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 3a | ground water | 6:2 FTS | 50.3 ppt | 5.0 ppt |
| Aug 30, 2023 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 18 | ground water | PFHpA | 3.1 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Aug 30, 2023 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 18 | ground water | PFHxA | 5.4 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Aug 30, 2023 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 18 | ground water | PFHxS | 10.5 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Aug 30, 2023 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 18 | ground water | PFOA | 10.2 ppt | 4.0 ppt |
| Aug 30, 2023 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 18 | ground water | PFOS | 11.1 ppt | 4.0 ppt |
| Aug 30, 2023 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 18 | ground water | PFPeA | 4.2 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Jan 24, 2024 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 5a | ground water | PFHxS | 3.5 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Jan 24, 2024 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 5a | ground water | PFOS | 4.2 ppt | 4.0 ppt |
| Aug 13, 2024 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 32 | ground water | PFHxA | 3.7 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Aug 13, 2024 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 32 | ground water | PFHxS | 8.4 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Aug 13, 2024 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 32 | ground water | PFOA | 7.4 ppt | 4.0 ppt |
| Aug 13, 2024 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 32 | ground water | PFOS | 9.9 ppt | 4.0 ppt |
| Aug 13, 2024 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 32 | ground water | Lithium | 10.2 ppb | 9 ppb |
Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 30 of 30 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 30 of 30 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 30 of 30 sampling events.
Lead at customer taps
In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 2 of the 19 periods on record.
In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb; 2 of the 19 monitoring periods on record reached the action level. The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).
| Monitoring period | Metal | 90th percentile | Action level | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009 | Lead | 17 ppb | 15 ppb | at or above the action level |
| Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006 | Lead | 5 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005 | Lead | 8 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004 | Lead | 17 ppb | 15 ppb | at or above the action level |
Show all 19 monitoring periods on record
| Monitoring period | Metal | 90th percentile | Action level | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009 | Lead | 17 ppb | 15 ppb | at or above the action level |
| Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006 | Lead | 5 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005 | Lead | 8 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004 | Lead | 17 ppb | 15 ppb | at or above the action level |
| Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003 | Lead | 8.3 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2002 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000 | Lead | 5 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996 | Lead | 8.3 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992 | Lead | 5 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992 | Lead | 5 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016
EPA lists no drinking-water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.
EPA's SDWIS database lists no drinking water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.
None on file.
Sanitary surveys and site visits
Most recent state inspection: Sep 10, 2025 (sanitary survey); 1 visit since Sep 3, 2021.
What you can do about these results
Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS
EPA testing found 7 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.
Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.
Filters certified for lead reduction
2 of this utility's 19 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 0 ppb).
NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.
Lithium: what reduces it
Lithium reached 10.2 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.
No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.
ZIP codes served
Sources
Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.
- EPA ECHO detailed facility report
- EPA UCMR 5 Data Finder
- EPA service-area boundary: modeled, 79.0 sq mi
