EPA system CA3610064 · California
East Valley Water District: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level
highest single sample; sampled October 2024–July 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.
East Valley Water District is a local-government-owned community water system in California serving about 108,629 people, matched to 5 ZIP codes.
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
What EPA says about what was found
- Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
- PFOS EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOS at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOS exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
- PFOA EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOA at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOA exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
- PFHxS EPA's 2024 rule cites health effects assessments associating PFHxS with thyroid, liver and immune effects. EPA source
Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.
PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found
EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 8. PFOA averaged 8.7 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt, and PFOS averaged 12.0 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. EPA's limit applies to a running yearly average and is enforced from 2029. That PFOS result is higher than 97% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it. Lithium reached 56.2 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.
Between October 2024 and July 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 840 samples from 13 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 8 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOA was 8.7 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 9.0 ppt). Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOS was 12.0 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 12.0 ppt). Lithium reached 56.2 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.
Show the 22 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
| Contaminant | Samples | Detections | Highest single sample | Complete-set average (results used) | EPA reference | Status | Sampled |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lithium | 28 | 21 | 56.2 ppb | 55.3 ppb (2 of 2) | 10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sample | at or above the health reference level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| PFOS | 28 | 3 | 12.0 ppt | 12.0 ppt (2 of 2) | 4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set average | at or above the MCL | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| PFOA | 28 | 2 | 9.0 ppt | 8.7 ppt (2 of 2) | 4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set average | at or above the MCL | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| PFPeA | 28 | 2 | 4.7 ppt | 4.5 ppt (2 of 2) | none set | detected; no EPA reference value | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| PFHpA | 28 | 1 | 3.1 ppt | 1.6 ppt (2 of 2) | none set | detected; no EPA reference value | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| PFHxS | 28 | 2 | 4.0 ppt | 3.9 ppt (2 of 2) | 10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set average | below the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed) | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| PFBS | 28 | 4 | 8.9 ppt | 8.2 ppt (2 of 2) | 2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest sample | below the health-based water concentration | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| PFHxA | 28 | 2 | 4.7 ppt | 4.4 ppt (2 of 2) | 3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest sample | below the screening level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| 11Cl-PF3OUdS | 28 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| 4:2 FTS | 28 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| 6:2 FTS | 28 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| 8:2 FTS | 28 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| 9Cl-PF3ONS | 28 | 0 | < 2.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| ADONA | 28 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| HFPO-DA (GenX) | 28 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | 10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set average | not detected above the reporting level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| NEtFOSAA | 28 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| NFDHA | 28 | 0 | < 20.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| NMeFOSAA | 28 | 0 | < 6.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| PFBA | 28 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | 6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest sample | not detected above the reporting level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| PFDA | 28 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| PFDoA | 28 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| PFEESA | 28 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| PFHpS | 28 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| PFMBA | 28 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| PFMPA | 28 | 0 | < 4.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| PFNA | 28 | 0 | < 4.0 ppt | — | 10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set average | not detected above the reporting level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| PFPeS | 28 | 0 | < 4.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| PFTA | 28 | 0 | < 8.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| PFTrDA | 28 | 0 | < 7.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
| PFUnA | 28 | 0 | < 2.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | October 2024 – July 2025 |
Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.
Every detection by sampling location (37 results)
| Date | Sampling location | Source water | Contaminant | Result | Reporting level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2024 | EP #22 - Well 11A Treated Well 11a | ground water | Lithium | 23.7 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Oct 9, 2024 | EP #26 - Well 25A Treated Well 25a | ground water | Lithium | 18.5 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Oct 9, 2024 | EP #37 - Well 142 Treated Well 142 | ground water | PFBS | 4.8 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Oct 9, 2024 | EP #37 - Well 142 Treated Well 142 | ground water | PFOS | 4.1 ppt | 4.0 ppt |
| Oct 9, 2024 | EP #37 - Well 142 Treated Well 142 | ground water | Lithium | 53 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Oct 9, 2024 | EP #29 - Well 39 Treated Well 39 | ground water | Lithium | 27.2 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Oct 9, 2024 | EP #28 - Well 28A Treated Well 28a | ground water | Lithium | 25.5 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Oct 16, 2024 | EP #33 - Well 125 Treated Well 125 | ground water | Lithium | 18.8 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Oct 16, 2024 | EP #34 - Well 132-5 Treated Well 132-5 | ground water | Lithium | 56.2 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Oct 21, 2024 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 151 Well 151 | ground water | Lithium | 10.9 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Oct 21, 2024 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120 | ground water | PFBS | 8.9 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Oct 21, 2024 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120 | ground water | PFHpA | 3.1 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Oct 21, 2024 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120 | ground water | PFHxA | 4.7 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Oct 21, 2024 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120 | ground water | PFHxS | 4.0 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Oct 21, 2024 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120 | ground water | PFOA | 8.4 ppt | 4.0 ppt |
| Oct 21, 2024 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120 | ground water | PFOS | 12.0 ppt | 4.0 ppt |
| Oct 21, 2024 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120 | ground water | PFPeA | 4.7 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Oct 21, 2024 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120 | ground water | Lithium | 31.5 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Oct 21, 2024 | EP #36 - Well 141 Treated Well 141 | ground water | Lithium | 14.3 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Jan 14, 2025 | EP #10 - Disch. TP Effluent Philip A. Disch Tp | surface water | Lithium | 31.2 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Apr 2, 2025 | EP #22 - Well 11A Treated Well 11a | ground water | Lithium | 28.1 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Apr 2, 2025 | EP #26 - Well 25A Treated Well 25a | ground water | Lithium | 18.6 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Apr 2, 2025 | EP #37 - Well 142 Treated Well 142 | ground water | PFBS | 4.4 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Apr 2, 2025 | EP #37 - Well 142 Treated Well 142 | ground water | Lithium | 54.8 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Apr 2, 2025 | EP #29 - Well 39 Treated Well 39 | ground water | Lithium | 28.3 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Apr 2, 2025 | EP #28 - Well 28A Treated Well 28a | ground water | Lithium | 27.6 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Apr 9, 2025 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 151 Well 151 | ground water | Lithium | 11.5 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Apr 9, 2025 | EP #33 - Well 125 Treated Well 125 | ground water | Lithium | 19.9 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Apr 9, 2025 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120 | ground water | PFBS | 7.4 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Apr 9, 2025 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120 | ground water | PFHxA | 4.1 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Apr 9, 2025 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120 | ground water | PFHxS | 3.8 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Apr 9, 2025 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120 | ground water | PFOA | 9.0 ppt | 4.0 ppt |
| Apr 9, 2025 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120 | ground water | PFOS | 12.0 ppt | 4.0 ppt |
| Apr 9, 2025 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120 | ground water | PFPeA | 4.2 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Apr 9, 2025 | Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120 | ground water | Lithium | 32.3 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Apr 9, 2025 | EP #34 - Well 132-5 Treated Well 132-5 | ground water | Lithium | 54.4 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Apr 22, 2025 | EP #36 - Well 141 Treated Well 141 | ground water | Lithium | 13.4 ppb | 9 ppb |
Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: no at 29 of 36 sampling events, yes at 7 of 36 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 25 of 36 sampling events, not known at 11 of 36 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 7 of 7 sampling events.
Lead at customer taps
In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 2 of the 27 periods on record.
In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb; 2 of the 27 monitoring periods on record reached the action level. The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).
| Monitoring period | Metal | 90th percentile | Action level | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021 | Lead | 2.8 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012 | Lead | 7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009 | Lead | 7.4 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006 | Lead | 7.2 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006 | Lead | 7.2 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005 | Lead | 8 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005 | Lead | 6.8 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004 | Lead | 7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004 | Lead | 8.7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
Show all 27 monitoring periods on record
| Monitoring period | Metal | 90th percentile | Action level | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021 | Lead | 2.8 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012 | Lead | 7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009 | Lead | 7.4 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006 | Lead | 7.2 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006 | Lead | 7.2 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005 | Lead | 8 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005 | Lead | 6.8 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004 | Lead | 7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004 | Lead | 8.7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2003 | Lead | 6 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003 | Lead | 15 ppb | 15 ppb | at or above the action level |
| Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2002 | Lead | 7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002 | Lead | 9.7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001 | Lead | 9 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001 | Lead | 9.7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2001 – Jun 30, 2001 | Lead | 6.8 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000 | Lead | 7.1 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jul 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000 | Lead | 7.1 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999 | Lead | 9.4 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997 | Lead | 7.1 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996 | Lead | 7.1 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1993 – Dec 31, 1993 | Lead | 6 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1993 – Jun 30, 1993 | Lead | 6 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992 | Lead | 15 ppb | 15 ppb | at or above the action level |
Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016
EPA lists 3 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 3 are health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met.
EPA's SDWIS database lists 3 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 3 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met).
| Compliance period | Type | Contaminant / rule | Description | Records | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2017 – Mar 31, 2017 | MCL · health-based | Tthm (0.087 MG/L, limit 0.080 mg/L) | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 1 record | Resolved · 2 enforcement actions |
| Jan 1, 2017 – Mar 31, 2017 | MCL · health-based | Tthm (0.084 MG/L, limit 0.080 mg/L) | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 1 record | Resolved · 2 enforcement actions |
| Jan 1, 2017 – Mar 31, 2017 | MCL · health-based | Tthm (0.092 MG/L, limit 0.080 mg/L) | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 1 record | Resolved · 2 enforcement actions |
Sanitary surveys and site visits
Most recent state inspection: Jun 28, 2018 (sanitary survey); 0 visits since Sep 3, 2021.
What you can do about these results
Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS
EPA testing found 7 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.
Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.
Filters certified for lead reduction
2 of this utility's 27 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 0 ppb).
NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.
Lithium: what reduces it
Lithium reached 56.2 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.
No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.
ZIP codes served
Sources
Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.
- EPA ECHO detailed facility report
- EPA UCMR 5 Data Finder
- EPA service-area boundary: modeled, 30.0 sq mi
