Tap Water Lookup

EPA system CA3610064 · California

East Valley Water District: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID CA3610064; community water system; California; source: surface water; serves 108,629 people via 21,770 connections; status: active

In focus108,629people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 56.2 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.56.2 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled October 2024–July 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

East Valley Water District is a local-government-owned community water system in California serving about 108,629 people, matched to 5 ZIP codes.

8.7 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
2 of 2 results at the highest location; highest single sample 9.0 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
12.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
2 of 2 results at the highest location; highest single sample 12.0 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
56.2 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
21 of 28 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
7 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
840 results, 13 entry points
2 at or above an MCL on the average basis
0 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2024
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
3
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
3 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (7 of 7 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 7 of 36 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFOS EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOS at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOS exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFOA EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOA at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOA exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFHxS EPA's 2024 rule cites health effects assessments associating PFHxS with thyroid, liver and immune effects. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 8. PFOA averaged 8.7 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt, and PFOS averaged 12.0 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. EPA's limit applies to a running yearly average and is enforced from 2029. That PFOS result is higher than 97% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it. Lithium reached 56.2 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between October 2024 and July 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 840 samples from 13 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 8 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOA was 8.7 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 9.0 ppt). Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOS was 12.0 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 12.0 ppt). Lithium reached 56.2 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
56.2 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFOScomplete-set average
12.0 ppt
at or above the MCL
PFOAcomplete-set average
8.7 ppt
at or above the MCL
PFPeAhighest single sample
4.7 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFHpAhighest single sample
3.1 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFHxScomplete-set average
3.9 ppt
below the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)
PFBShighest single sample
8.9 ppt
below the health-based water concentration
PFHxAhighest single sample
4.7 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 22 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium282156.2 ppb55.3 ppb (2 of 2)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFOS28312.0 ppt12.0 ppt (2 of 2)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averageat or above the MCLOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFOA2829.0 ppt8.7 ppt (2 of 2)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averageat or above the MCLOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFPeA2824.7 ppt4.5 ppt (2 of 2)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFHpA2813.1 ppt1.6 ppt (2 of 2)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFHxS2824.0 ppt3.9 ppt (2 of 2)10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)October 2024 – July 2025
PFBS2848.9 ppt8.2 ppt (2 of 2)2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplebelow the health-based water concentrationOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFHxA2824.7 ppt4.4 ppt (2 of 2)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
11Cl-PF3OUdS280< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
4:2 FTS280< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
6:2 FTS280< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
8:2 FTS280< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS280< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
ADONA280< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)280< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
NEtFOSAA280< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
NFDHA280< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
NMeFOSAA280< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFBA280< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFDA280< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFDoA280< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFEESA280< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFHpS280< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFMBA280< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFMPA280< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFNA280< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFPeS280< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFTA280< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFTrDA280< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
PFUnA280< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelOctober 2024 – July 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (37 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Oct 9, 2024EP #22 - Well 11A Treated Well 11aground waterLithium23.7 ppb9 ppb
Oct 9, 2024EP #26 - Well 25A Treated Well 25aground waterLithium18.5 ppb9 ppb
Oct 9, 2024EP #37 - Well 142 Treated Well 142ground waterPFBS4.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 9, 2024EP #37 - Well 142 Treated Well 142ground waterPFOS4.1 ppt4.0 ppt
Oct 9, 2024EP #37 - Well 142 Treated Well 142ground waterLithium53 ppb9 ppb
Oct 9, 2024EP #29 - Well 39 Treated Well 39ground waterLithium27.2 ppb9 ppb
Oct 9, 2024EP #28 - Well 28A Treated Well 28aground waterLithium25.5 ppb9 ppb
Oct 16, 2024EP #33 - Well 125 Treated Well 125ground waterLithium18.8 ppb9 ppb
Oct 16, 2024EP #34 - Well 132-5 Treated Well 132-5ground waterLithium56.2 ppb9 ppb
Oct 21, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Well 151 Well 151ground waterLithium10.9 ppb9 ppb
Oct 21, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120ground waterPFBS8.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 21, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120ground waterPFHpA3.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 21, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120ground waterPFHxA4.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 21, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120ground waterPFHxS4.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 21, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120ground waterPFOA8.4 ppt4.0 ppt
Oct 21, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120ground waterPFOS12.0 ppt4.0 ppt
Oct 21, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120ground waterPFPeA4.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 21, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120ground waterLithium31.5 ppb9 ppb
Oct 21, 2024EP #36 - Well 141 Treated Well 141ground waterLithium14.3 ppb9 ppb
Jan 14, 2025EP #10 - Disch. TP Effluent Philip A. Disch Tpsurface waterLithium31.2 ppb9 ppb
Apr 2, 2025EP #22 - Well 11A Treated Well 11aground waterLithium28.1 ppb9 ppb
Apr 2, 2025EP #26 - Well 25A Treated Well 25aground waterLithium18.6 ppb9 ppb
Apr 2, 2025EP #37 - Well 142 Treated Well 142ground waterPFBS4.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 2, 2025EP #37 - Well 142 Treated Well 142ground waterLithium54.8 ppb9 ppb
Apr 2, 2025EP #29 - Well 39 Treated Well 39ground waterLithium28.3 ppb9 ppb
Apr 2, 2025EP #28 - Well 28A Treated Well 28aground waterLithium27.6 ppb9 ppb
Apr 9, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Well 151 Well 151ground waterLithium11.5 ppb9 ppb
Apr 9, 2025EP #33 - Well 125 Treated Well 125ground waterLithium19.9 ppb9 ppb
Apr 9, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120ground waterPFBS7.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 9, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120ground waterPFHxA4.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 9, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120ground waterPFHxS3.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 9, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120ground waterPFOA9.0 ppt4.0 ppt
Apr 9, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120ground waterPFOS12.0 ppt4.0 ppt
Apr 9, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120ground waterPFPeA4.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 9, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Well 120ground waterLithium32.3 ppb9 ppb
Apr 9, 2025EP #34 - Well 132-5 Treated Well 132-5ground waterLithium54.4 ppb9 ppb
Apr 22, 2025EP #36 - Well 141 Treated Well 141ground waterLithium13.4 ppb9 ppb

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: no at 29 of 36 sampling events, yes at 7 of 36 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 25 of 36 sampling events, not known at 11 of 36 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 7 of 7 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 2 of the 27 periods on record.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004: 7 ppbJan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004: 8.7 ppbJan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005: 8 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005: 6.8 ppbJan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006: 7.2 ppbJan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006: 7.2 ppbJan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009: 7.4 ppbJan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012: 7 ppbJan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015: 0 ppbJan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018: 0 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021: 2.8 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024: 0 ppbDec 31, 2004Dec 31, 20240 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb; 2 of the 27 monitoring periods on record reached the action level. The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead2.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009Lead7.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006Lead7.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006Lead7.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005Lead6.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead8.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 27 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead2.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009Lead7.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006Lead7.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006Lead7.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005Lead6.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead8.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2003Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003Lead15 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2002Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead9.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead9.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Jun 30, 2001Lead6.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead7.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead7.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead9.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead7.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996Lead7.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Dec 31, 1993Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Jun 30, 1993Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead15 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 3 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 3 are health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 3 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 3 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met).

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Jan 1, 2017 – Mar 31, 2017MCL · health-basedTthm (0.087 MG/L, limit 0.080 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2017 – Mar 31, 2017MCL · health-basedTthm (0.084 MG/L, limit 0.080 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2017 – Mar 31, 2017MCL · health-basedTthm (0.092 MG/L, limit 0.080 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Jun 28, 2018 (sanitary survey); 0 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 7 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Filters certified for lead reduction

2 of this utility's 27 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 0 ppb).

NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 56.2 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records