Tap Water Lookup

EPA system WA5338150 · Washington

Kent Water Department: 1 PFAS found; PFBS up to 3.5 ppt, below the 2,000 ppt health-based water concentration

System ID WA5338150; community water system; Washington; source: purchased surface water; serves 166,421 people via 35,962 connections; status: active

In focus166,421people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referencePFBS
PFBS: 3.5 ppt; health-based water concentration 2,000 ppt. highest single sample.3.5 ppthealth-based water concentration: 2,000 ppt

highest single sample; sampled January 2025–December 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Kent Water Department is a local-government-owned community water system in Washington serving about 166,421 people, matched to 4 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
14 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
14 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 9 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
14 samples, none above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · not detected above the reporting level
1 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
420 results, 6 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
0 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2024
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
1 violation in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (6 of 6 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 6 of 14 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • PFBS EPA's 2021 PFBS toxicity assessment cites thyroid, kidney and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 1.

Between January 2025 and December 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 420 samples from 6 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 1 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
PFBShighest single sample
3.5 ppt
below the health-based water concentration
Show the 29 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Lithiumnot detected · reporting level 9 ppb
< 9 ppb
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
PFBS1423.5 ppt3.4 ppt (2 of 2)2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplebelow the health-based water concentrationJanuary 2025 – December 2025
11Cl-PF3OUdS140< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
4:2 FTS140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
6:2 FTS140< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
8:2 FTS140< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS140< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
ADONA140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)140< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
Lithium140< 9 ppb10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
NEtFOSAA140< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
NFDHA140< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
NMeFOSAA140< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
PFBA140< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
PFDA140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
PFDoA140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
PFEESA140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
PFHpA140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
PFHpS140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
PFHxA140< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
PFHxS140< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
PFMBA140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
PFMPA140< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
PFNA140< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
PFOA140< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
PFOS140< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
PFPeA140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
PFPeS140< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
PFTA140< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
PFTrDA140< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
PFUnA140< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – December 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (2 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Feb 4, 2025EHW Corrosion Sample Tap East Hill Wellground waterPFBS3.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 21, 2025EHW Corrosion Sample Tap East Hill Wellground waterPFBS3.5 ppt3.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 6 of 14 sampling events, no at 4 of 14 sampling events, not known at 4 of 14 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 10 of 14 sampling events, not known at 4 of 14 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 6 of 6 sampling events.

Lead and copper at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 11 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992: 13 ppbJul 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003: 3 ppbMar 1, 2004 – Aug 31, 2004: 3 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005: 2 ppbJan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006: 2 ppbJan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009: 4 ppbJan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012: 3 ppbJan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015: 2.2 ppbJan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018: 1 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021: 1 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024: 0 ppbDec 31, 1992Dec 31, 20240 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (11 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015Lead2.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Mar 1, 2004 – Aug 31, 2004Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Copper3,400 ppb1,300 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead13 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 1 violation since Sep 3, 2016. None is health-based. All concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices, not the water itself.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 1 violation recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 1 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements), none health-based.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Jul 1, 2024OtherConsumer Confidence RuleConsumer Confidence Report Complete Failure to Report1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Jun 10, 2021 (sanitary survey); 0 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 1 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records