Tap Water Lookup

EPA system WA5340800 · Washington

Northshore Utility District: No PFAS or lithium found in EPA testing

System ID WA5340800; community water system; Washington; source: purchased surface water; serves 99,789 people via 32,644 connections; status: active

In focus99,789people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLead, 90th percentile at customer taps
Lead, 90th percentile at customer taps: 36 ppb; action level 15 ppb. 90th percentile for the latest monitoring period.36 ppbaction level: 15 ppb

90th percentile for the latest monitoring period; sampled Dec 31, 1992. Source: EPA SDWIS/ECHO.

Northshore Utility District is a local-government-owned community water system in Washington serving about 99,789 people, matched to 5 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
4 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
4 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 9 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
4 samples, none above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · not detected above the reporting level
0 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
120 results, 1 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
36 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 1992
action level 15 ppb · at or above the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
0 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (1 of 1 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 1 of 4 sampling events

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found none of them at levels its laboratories can measure.

Between March 2023 and December 2023, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 120 samples from 1 sampling location for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). None were found above their minimum reporting levels.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
No contaminant was detected above its reporting level.
Show the 30 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Lithiumnot detected · reporting level 9 ppb
< 9 ppb
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
11Cl-PF3OUdS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
4:2 FTS40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
6:2 FTS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
8:2 FTS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
9Cl-PF3ONS40< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
ADONA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
HFPO-DA (GenX)40< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
Lithium40< 9 ppb10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
NEtFOSAA40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
NFDHA40< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
NMeFOSAA40< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
PFBA40< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
PFBS40< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
PFDA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
PFDoA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
PFEESA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
PFHpA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
PFHpS40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
PFHxA40< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
PFHxS40< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
PFMBA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
PFMPA40< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
PFNA40< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
PFOA40< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
PFOS40< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
PFPeA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
PFPeS40< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
PFTA40< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
PFTrDA40< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
PFUnA40< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – December 2023
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: no at 3 of 4 sampling events, yes at 1 of 4 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 4 of 4 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 1 of 1 sampling event.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 1992, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 36 ppb, at or above the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 2 of the 2 periods on record.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992: 29 ppbJul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992: 36 ppbJun 30, 1992Dec 31, 199236 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 1992, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 36 ppb, at or above the action level of 15 ppb; 2 of the 2 monitoring periods on record reached the action level. The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead36 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead29 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists no drinking-water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

EPA's SDWIS database lists no drinking water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

None on file.

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Mar 25, 2025 (sanitary survey); 1 visit since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified for lead reduction

2 of this utility's 2 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 36 ppb).

NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records